Fred C Dobbs wrote:

> In article <a69cf1e945babb2784f18dae5051e61a@gpftor3.privacyf oundation.de>
> Anonymous Remailer <mixmaster@gpftor3.privacyfoundation.de> wrote:
> >
> > A. Lurker wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:34:27 +0200 (CEST), Baal
> > > <Baal@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > >Hash: SHA512
> > > >
> > > >DarkSide of Nightmix wrote in alt.privacy.anon-server on August 18, 2008
> > > >01:52 in Message-ID: <5Z14KJ6N39678.3284375@anonymous.poster>:
> > > >
> > > >>> Mr. Townsville confirmed the existence of the group, and handed-over both
> > > >>> halves of the group's PGP keypair, allowing police to decrypt all postings
> > > >>> made to members of the group.
> > > >>
> > > >> This doesn't sound logical. Did he have their private keys also?
> > > >
> > > >Once one was accepted for 'membership' in the group, Nagaru sent the group
> > > >keypair to the new member. This keypair consisted of /both/ the public- and
> > > >private-halves of that PGP key.
> > > >
> > > >Traffic meant for the group as a whole was encrypted to this public key--as
> > > >everyone who was a member of the group had a copy of the private-half of
> > > >the key, they could decrypt all messages encrypted with it.
> > > >
> > > >Now, this made sense from a key-management point of view--the alternative
> > > >was to have to juggle dozens of keys.
> >
> > Anyone with the IQ of a peanut or better and 30 seconds of free
> > time could figure out that there's no need to "juggle" anything.
> > PGP and GnuPG both have built in ways to deal with multiple
> > recipients simply and painlessly.
> >
> > The REAL reason these pedofucks got nailed is they were plain old
> > stupid for taking the advice of an incompetent fools like Yardturd
> > and Doctor DiaperSniper.
> >
>
> Don't you mean "they were plain old stupid for NOT taking the advice of
> Yardbird, aka Doctor Who"?

Why no you shitforbrains pedofuck degenerate, I meant precisely
what I said.

Now is there anything else your sub-kindergarten mind needs cleared
up this day?

In article <8838152ee22080d925c70de69982500e@remailer.cyberia de.it>
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer <anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote:
>
> Fred C Dobbs wrote:
>
> > In article <a69cf1e945babb2784f18dae5051e61a@gpftor3.privacyf oundation.de>
> > Anonymous Remailer <mixmaster@gpftor3.privacyfoundation.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > A. Lurker wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:34:27 +0200 (CEST), Baal
> > > > <Baal@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > >Hash: SHA512
> > > > >
> > > > >DarkSide of Nightmix wrote in alt.privacy.anon-server on August 18, 2008
> > > > >01:52 in Message-ID: <5Z14KJ6N39678.3284375@anonymous.poster>:
> > > > >
> > > > >>> Mr. Townsville confirmed the existence of the group, and handed-over both
> > > > >>> halves of the group's PGP keypair, allowing police to decrypt all postings
> > > > >>> made to members of the group.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This doesn't sound logical. Did he have their private keys also?
> > > > >
> > > > >Once one was accepted for 'membership' in the group, Nagaru sent the group
> > > > >keypair to the new member. This keypair consisted of /both/ the public- and
> > > > >private-halves of that PGP key.
> > > > >
> > > > >Traffic meant for the group as a whole was encrypted to this public key--as
> > > > >everyone who was a member of the group had a copy of the private-half of
> > > > >the key, they could decrypt all messages encrypted with it.
> > > > >
> > > > >Now, this made sense from a key-management point of view--the alternative
> > > > >was to have to juggle dozens of keys.
> > >
> > > Anyone with the IQ of a peanut or better and 30 seconds of free
> > > time could figure out that there's no need to "juggle" anything.
> > > PGP and GnuPG both have built in ways to deal with multiple
> > > recipients simply and painlessly.
> > >
> > > The REAL reason these pedofucks got nailed is they were plain old
> > > stupid for taking the advice of an incompetent fools like Yardturd
> > > and Doctor DiaperSniper.
> > >
> >
> > Don't you mean "they were plain old stupid for NOT taking the advice of
> > Yardbird, aka Doctor Who"?
>
> Why no you shitforbrains pedofuck degenerate, I meant precisely
> what I said.
>
> Now is there anything else your sub-kindergarten mind needs cleared
> up this day?

Hey poo-poo panties, aren't you the sub-retard that bet a Haitian boy's butt
that I was Dr. Who?

"Ahh, but the strawberries that's, that's where I had them."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Caine_Mutiny_(film)

"Ahh, but Fred C Dobbs and Dr.Who posted from AIOE and the NNTP posting
hosts were the same"

Fucktard, smeg wadd, eat dead Haitian shit and meet your fucked up God
in Haitian Hell !

PS: Did Boschloo (sp?) disapear at the same time as Yardbird/Dr.Who?

I always suspected Yardbird as being muliple personalities in his group,
maybe he did the same here.

Fred C Dobbs wrote:

> Haitian

<flush pathetic pedo-rant>

Your infatuation with black cock is showing again pedofuck.

In article <807690837cfc5f26456d7b827bee5085@pboxmix.winstons mith.info>
"Non scrivetemi" <nonscrivetemi@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info> wrote:
>
> Fred C Dobbs wrote:
>
> > Haitian
>
> <flush pathetic pedo-rant>
>
> Your infatuation with black cock is showing again pedofuck.

Nice try at evading the question.

Wipe that HIV+ cum from your lips before it drips on your keyboard
and admit you don't know shit from shinola!

In article <9CYB6R9239723.503587963@reece.net.au>
Fred C Dobbs <fredcdobbs@nymialias.net> wrote:
>
> In article <8838152ee22080d925c70de69982500e@remailer.cyberia de.it>
> Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer <anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote:
> >
> > Fred C Dobbs wrote:
> >
> > > In article <a69cf1e945babb2784f18dae5051e61a@gpftor3.privacyf oundation.de>
> > > Anonymous Remailer <mixmaster@gpftor3.privacyfoundation.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A. Lurker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:34:27 +0200 (CEST), Baal
> > > > > <Baal@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > >Hash: SHA512
> > > > > >
> > > > > >DarkSide of Nightmix wrote in alt.privacy.anon-server on August 18, 2008
> > > > > >01:52 in Message-ID: <5Z14KJ6N39678.3284375@anonymous.poster>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>> Mr. Townsville confirmed the existence of the group, and handed-over both
> > > > > >>> halves of the group's PGP keypair, allowing police to decrypt all postings
> > > > > >>> made to members of the group.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This doesn't sound logical. Did he have their private keys also?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Once one was accepted for 'membership' in the group, Nagaru sent the group
> > > > > >keypair to the new member. This keypair consisted of /both/ the public- and
> > > > > >private-halves of that PGP key.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Traffic meant for the group as a whole was encrypted to this public key--as
> > > > > >everyone who was a member of the group had a copy of the private-half of
> > > > > >the key, they could decrypt all messages encrypted with it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Now, this made sense from a key-management point of view--the alternative
> > > > > >was to have to juggle dozens of keys.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone with the IQ of a peanut or better and 30 seconds of free
> > > > time could figure out that there's no need to "juggle" anything.
> > > > PGP and GnuPG both have built in ways to deal with multiple
> > > > recipients simply and painlessly.
> > > >
> > > > The REAL reason these pedofucks got nailed is they were plain old
> > > > stupid for taking the advice of an incompetent fools like Yardturd
> > > > and Doctor DiaperSniper.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Don't you mean "they were plain old stupid for NOT taking the advice of
> > > Yardbird, aka Doctor Who"?
> >
> > Why no you shitforbrains pedofuck degenerate, I meant precisely
> > what I said.
> >
> > Now is there anything else your sub-kindergarten mind needs cleared
> > up this day?
>
> Hey poo-poo panties, aren't you the sub-retard that bet a Haitian boy's butt
> that I was Dr. Who?

Oh my, no 20 paragraph response?

You mean I really won an argument with the APAS troll?